Real estate investment is a cornerstone of wealth creation, but buying physical property is illiquid and expensive. The solution for public market investors is **REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts)**, easily accessed through low-cost ETFs. The two titans in this space are **VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF)** and **RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF)**. Both offer exposure to a diversified basket of income-producing properties, but their subtle differences in index methodology can affect returns, especially during economic shifts. If your goal is to add a powerful source of dividend income and an inflation hedge, this guide will help you **Just Copy & Paste** the superior REITs ETF.

Infographic explaining REITs: 90% income distribution rule and the benefit of high dividend yield


**Beginner Friendly Tip:** REITs are legally required to pass on 90% of their taxable income to shareholders, which is why VNQ and RWR typically have higher dividend yields than standard S&P 500 funds.

VNQ vs RWR: A Battle of Index Breadth

Both ETFs are designed to capture the performance of the US equity REIT market. Their expense ratios are nearly identical (both are ultra-low cost, with a minimal advantage to VNQ). The main difference lies in their index construction.

1. VNQ (Vanguard) - The Broad Market Approach

VNQ tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate Index. This index is generally **broader** than RWR's, holding more mid-cap and small-cap REITs. This larger universe (around 170-180 holdings) means VNQ offers slightly deeper diversification across the real estate spectrum.

2. RWR (SPDR) - The Focused Approach

RWR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index. This index is more **selective**, holding fewer names (around 100-110 holdings) and generally focusing more heavily on the largest, most established REITs. This concentration can lead to slightly different performance characteristics during sector-specific shifts.

Chart comparing the number of holdings: VNQ (~180) vs RWR (~100).


Sector Allocation Differences

Although the holdings are similar, the minor differences in index weighting result in slight sector tilts:
• **VNQ** tends to have a slightly larger weighting in niche areas like **Data Centers and Infrastructure REITs**, offering a more modern portfolio tilt.
• **RWR** often has a marginally higher concentration in traditional sectors like **Retail and Residential REITs**.
However, both are heavily dominated by the largest segments, such as cell towers and industrial warehouses.

The Critical Comparison Table (VNQ vs RWR)

Use this table to decide which ETF best suits your diversification needs.

HTML & CSS Code (Comparison Table)

This clean, responsive table helps readers compare the key investment metrics.

Feature VNQ (Vanguard) RWR (SPDR)
Holdings Count ~180 (Broader) ~100 (More Focused)
Expense Ratio Ultra-Low (Slightly Lower) Ultra-Low (Slightly Higher)
Index Used MSCI US Investable Market Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate
Best For Maximum Diversification & Lowest Cost Focus on Largest, Most Established REITs

The Verdict: VNQ is the Default REITs Winner

For the vast majority of long-term investors seeking simple, low-cost access to the US REITs market, **VNQ is the clear winner.**

1. Cost and Breadth

VNQ's combination of a slightly lower expense ratio and a broader index makes it the more compelling choice for passive investing. The deeper exposure to the entire REIT market, including smaller players, aligns better with a total-market philosophy.

2. Liquidity

As the largest and most popular REITs ETF, VNQ enjoys superior liquidity, though RWR’s liquidity is also perfectly adequate for retail investors.

Total return comparison graph of VNQ vs RWR over a 10-year period, showing nearly identical performance.


Conclusion: The Income Booster

Both VNQ and RWR will deliver nearly identical long-term performance. However, due to its slightly lower cost and broader holdings, **VNQ is the recommended REITs choice for simplicity and passive efficiency.** Add a small allocation of VNQ to your portfolio (5-10%) to increase your overall dividend income and hedge against inflation.